Select Page

Step 1. Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Step 2. Make Payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Step 3. Receive your paper

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Assignment 3: Scholarly Paper Outline and Introductory Paragraph (10%) Instructi

by | Jun 22, 2022 | Nursing

 

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Assignment 3: Scholarly Paper Outline and Introductory Paragraph (10%) Instructions and Submission
Important Resources BASE IN CANADIAN STUDY
Below are several resources you can use to help you with Assignment 3. You will definitely want to review the Marking Rubric.
Assignment 3 Example
The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. (n.d.). Thesis Statements. Retrieved from http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/thesis-statements/
The Writing Centre, (2013). Developing a thesis statement. Retrieved from http;//sass.quenau.ca/writingcentre
Odegaard Writing & Research Center. (n.d.). Argumenative paper format. Retrieved from https://depts.washington.edu/owrc/Handouts/Argumentative%20Paper%20Format.pdf
Other resources are:
Williams, K. (n.d.). The argumentative paper. Retrieved from http://people.eku.edu/williamsf/RhetSum/ Be sure to click on ‘for special paper writing advice’ for a bit of a laugh.
Brizee, A. (2013, February 2). Introductions, Body Paragraphs, and Conclusions for an Argument Paper. Retrieved from https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/724/1/
How to Refute and Argument
Assignment 3 Instructions
The process of articulating and supporting a point of view requires you to narrow and focus your topic, create a clear and concise thesis statement, and later develop the body of the paper using literature and logic to support and defend your point of view. Clarity of language and thought is fundamental to a successful argument. This can be achieved through a good thesis statement, proper grammar and paragraph structure. Assignment 3 lays the foundation for this process and introduces you to the style of writing and formatting used in nursing and many other health professions.
Because focus and clarity is essential to articulating and supporting your argument, developing a thesis statement and an outline for your paper is essential; in order to do so you will need to begin a review of the relevant literature. After you have chosen the ethical issue about which you plan to write, complete and submit the following:
A paragraph that includes an introduction to the topic in a general to specific flow. This paragraph should be one paragraph and should be no more than half a page. Clay (2003) notes that a good introduction introduces the issue, showing its importance to nursing practice, includes the thesis statement, and gives a brief overview of the main points of the paper in the order that they are discussed. The paragraph likely will end with a thesis statement that is focused and makes the central idea of the paper clear. Your thesis statement must present an argument—that is, you will present a point of view that could be argued as true or false, and your paper will provide the support that defends your point of view as true. The thesis statement provides the reader with a “map” for the discussion that follows.
A proposed outline of your paper consisting of the major points and sub-points that you will be using to develop your point of view. There should be one major point for each paragraph. These should be clear, complete sentences that support your thesis statement.
List of references used to develop your outline. Your outline should be developed using at least five credible references published within the last five to ten years. The references must come from peer-reviewed journals, books and/or credible websites. Submit a preliminary reference list with these sources cited using APA format.
Submit Assignment 3 here. Wait until you receive feedback on this assignment from him or her before proceeding with Assignment 4, completion of your paper.
Submission status
Attempt number This is attempt 1.
Submission status No attempt
Grading status Not graded
Grading criteria
Thesis Statement
• Thesis statement is logical and reasonable.
• Thesis statement is controversial.
• Thesis statement is provable.
• Thesis statement is an opinion.
• Thesis statement presents your view and not the view of someone else.
Fail
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 9.98 (9.98%)
No thesis statement. Only a topic or an opinion. Student does not clearly understand the purpose of a thesis.
D
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10.98 (10.98%)
The thesis statement was vague/unclear, improperly placed, and/or did not clearly state the writer’s position; thus making the text difficult or impossible to follow. Attempted to communicate a topic plus an opinion but was too generic to get a clear sense of the writer’s point.
C-
Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11.98 (11.98%)
The thesis statement was present; however, not fully developed, perceptive or properly placed. The thesis statement states the writer’s position, although details may not be clear. The statement was not always: (a) logical and reasonable; (b) controversial; (c) provable; or, (d) the opinion of the writer.
C to C+
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13.98 (13.98%)
The thesis statement was present, somewhat perceptive and properly placed.The thesis statement states the writer’s position with mostly clear details. The statement was: (a) logical and reasonable; (b) controversial; (c) provable; or, (d) the opinion of the writer.
B- to B+
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15.98 (15.98%)
Above average thesis statement that was developed, perceptive and properly placed. The thesis statement obviously stated the writer’s position. The statement was: (a) logical and reasonable; (b) controversial; (c) provable; and, (d) the opinion of the writer.
A- to A+
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%)
Exceptionally well formed, perceptive and properly placed thesis statement clearly stated the writer’s position. The statement was: (a) logical and reasonable; (b) controversial; (c) provable; and, (d) the opinion of the writer.
Maximum score
20
Outline
• Major points and sub-points that will be used to develop your point of view.
• Points relate to the thesis statement.
• Opposing view refuted.
Fail
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34.93 (34.93%)
No or insufficient main points. Ideas were undeveloped and not linked to the thesis. Refutation was missing or vague. Falls short of University level writing.
D
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 38.43 (38.43%)
The main points were not sufficient. There was a poor/skimpy/ vague development of ideas and a weak or nonexistent link to the thesis.
C-
Points Range: 38.5 (38.5%) – 41.93 (41.93%)
Main points were present, but one or more may have lacked development and/or may not directly relate to the thesis. The essay met the requirements of the assignment and contained sufficient details to make the overall point clear, but it left the reader with unanswered questions. Support for argument was logical, but pattern of development and style was simplistic. Some aspects of argument did not relate to thesis.
C to C+
Points Range: 42 (42%) – 48.93 (48.93%)
Main points were present, developed and related to the thesis. The essay met the requirements of the assignment and contained sufficient details to make the overall points clear. Support for argument was logical and the argument mostly related to the thesis.
B- to B+
Points Range: 49 (49%) – 55.93 (55.93%)
Main points were present and directly related to the thesis, but one or more may have lacked enough detail and development. Patterns of development used for support and the style added to the argument. Each aspect of argument was present, but the writer may not have always shown connection to thesis.
A- to A+
Points Range: 56 (56%) – 70 (70%)
Main points were well developed and directly related to the thesis. The supporting details were concrete. Support used appropriate patterns of development and style. Each aspect related to the thesis, providing coherence and continuity
Maximum score
70
Writing and Format
• Introduction and conclusion.
• In-text citations and reference list.
• Formatting.
• Writing.
Fail
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4.99 (4.99%)
Introduction and conclusion inadequately developed and lacked details and was not relevant or logically presented. In-text citations or reference list consistently not according to APA style rules. Formatting consistently not according to APA style rules. Frequently misspells words and makes grammatical errors. Frequent errors in language conventions. Falls short of University level writing.
D
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5.49 (5.49%)
Introduction and conclusion not adequately developed and lacked a number of details, was not relevant, or was not presented in a logical order. A number (>5) of in-text citations not according to APA style rules. A number (>5) of formatting errors according to APA style rules. Frequently grammatical or typographical errors. Frequent errors in language conventions. Marginal University level writing.
C-
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.99 (5.99%)
Introduction and conclusion adequately developed although lacked some details, or was not fully relevant, or was not fully presented in a logical order. Several (3-4) of in-text citation or reference errors according to APA style rules. Several (3-4) formatting errors according to APA style rules. Several grammatical or typographical errors. Several errors in language conventions. Adequate University level writing.
C to C+
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6.99 (6.99%)
Introduction and conclusion developed. In-text citations and references mostly according to APA style rules. Formatting mostly according to APA style rules. Satisfactory University level writing.
B- to B+
Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7.99 (7.99%)
Very well developed introduction and conclusion that were inviting, engaged the reader, and created interest. Small numbers of in-text citation errors or references according to APA style rules. Small numbers (1-2) of formatting errors according to APA style rules. Small numbers of grammatical or typographical errors. Small numbers of inaccurate language conventions. Above average University level writing.
A- to A+
Points Range: 8 (8%) – 10 (10%)
Exceptionally well developed introduction and conclusion that were inviting, engaged the reader, and created interest. Information was relevant and presented in a logical order. In-text citations and references according to APA style rules. Format correct according to APA style rules. Uses English conventionally without grammatical or typographical errors. Shows mastery of academic English. Exemplary University level writing.
Maximum score
10

 

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Treat Yourself to Much Needed Assistance